Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login


Submitted on
April 3, 2012
Image Size
2.3 MB
Submitted with


5,503 (7 today)
63 (who?)

Camera Data

Spinosaurus BETA version II by Miyess Spinosaurus BETA version II by Miyess
Version II of Spinosaurus.

Jurassic Park InGen Files: Spinosaurus aegyptiacus

Age: Cretaceous (112 to 97 million years ago)

Diet: Carnivore

Length: Around 17 meters long when full grown.


This work is covered under copyright law. You may not use my work for layouts, blogs, websites, myspace/facebook pages (or the like), banners, designs, posters, CD, books etc… without receiving permission or a license from me. My work is not stock photography. If I find that my work is being used illegally, then legal action will be taken. If you see my work being used, please E-mail me right away.
Please respect copyrights.

Add a Comment:
MesozoicMasacre Featured By Owner Mar 26, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Can I use it as a reference for pivot?
Miyess Featured By Owner Mar 28, 2013   Digital Artist
What is pivot? I don't usually say no to people referencing my work, as long as they give credit & link back to the original...
MesozoicMasacre Featured By Owner Mar 28, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Miyess Featured By Owner Mar 28, 2013   Digital Artist
As long as you use it only as a reference (which means make your own spino based on this, not take this one and manipulate it in pivot), I don’t have a problem with that. However, I must insist on a credit note in the description of wherever you upload it, stating that you used my work as a reference, and a link back to here so people can see.

Also send me a link to the finished work, as I would be interested to see what you come up with... :)
Dinosuarjosh Featured By Owner Sep 14, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Kaijurider24 Featured By Owner Jul 29, 2012  Hobbyist Writer
I can understand why it is top secret. Seeing as how I have done research and heard that Spino was a mistake. No duh InGen decided to keep this beast under wraps. FAVED!
Miyess Featured By Owner Aug 19, 2012   Digital Artist
Thanks :)

I hate the idea some people keep promoting that the Spinosaurus was a mistake, and that InGen thought it was a Baryonyx until it outgrew the others and grew a sail on its back. So then they isolated it in an underground bunker! How ridiculous... :roll: They also imply that the one seen in the movie is the only one.

I think that is stupid. First of all InGen would know exactly where the amber/and bones came from in the case of Spinosaurus they would have came from Egypt or morocco NOT England or Spain which is where Baryonyx is from. So that would have been a clue. Also who the hell would they confuse the hatchlings for the same species?! Even juveniles of very closely related species (such as lions and tigers) don’t look the same at all. And though Spinosaurus is related to Baryonyx, it’s not that close. Spinosaurus is much more closely related to Irritator, or Angaturama. If they said that InGen scientists confused Spinosaurus with one of those, just on physical appearance, it wouldn’t be so bad, but still the hatchlings would look different without a doubt.

There is a much more plausible/obvious reason for InGen to keep the Spinosaurs under wraps (though certainly not in a bloody underground bunker!)...
Kaijurider24 Featured By Owner Aug 20, 2012  Hobbyist Writer
Hellraptor Featured By Owner Apr 17, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
The most violent and dangerous thing on sorna.
Add a Comment: